|  | News was prepared under the information support of Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and international Shipping "Hellenic Shipping News". | 
31 Oct 2010
 How does a steelmaker achieve raw materials security? Either by way of owning mines, not an easy proposition though because of competition becoming increasingly intense in acquiring deposits or by using swaps in the derivatives field to hedge price volatility and thereby manage risk. 
SAIL and Tata Steel group’s Indian operations have the benefit of total 
captive sourcing of iron ore and also partly for coking coal. But the 
other big steelmakers here like most of their peers abroad do not have 
this luxury.
How does a steelmaker achieve raw materials security? Either by way of owning mines, not an easy proposition though because of competition becoming increasingly intense in acquiring deposits or by using swaps in the derivatives field to hedge price volatility and thereby manage risk. 
SAIL and Tata Steel group’s Indian operations have the benefit of total 
captive sourcing of iron ore and also partly for coking coal. But the 
other big steelmakers here like most of their peers abroad do not have 
this luxury.
TSG makes the major portion of the metal in Europe, the UK and 
south-east Asia because of its ownership of Corus and Natsteel. The 
group though has acquired interest in coal and ore properties in 
Mozambique and Canada to be developed remains vulnerable to what 
chairman Ratan Tata describes as “opportunistic price” setting by the 
world’s big three miners.
Whatever its plans for minerals assets acquisition, TSG will be required
to buy very large quantities of iron ore and coal from the market 
destined to remain highly volatile. This explains why the group is to 
develop “operating and hedging strategies” to tackle the uncertainties 
of spot markets. Mind you not only did iron ore become twice more 
expensive at one point since last year, the dropping of the 40 year old 
benchmark system of annual contracts for quarterly pricing system linked
to the spot market has created the ground for significant price swing. 
The biggest mover of the ore market, as the world is seeing it again and
again, is any news relating to China. This is because as the world’s 
largest producer of steel but with restricted domestic supply of the 
mineral on ideal iron content basis, China has huge dependence on 
imports, including from India.
Initially, it was said that China’s ore imports will rise seven per cent
this year to 670 million tonnes. But now an official of China Iron 
& Steel Association (CISA) says imports in 2010 will likely fall. In
this year’s first eight months China imported 405 million tonnes of ore
and according to a projection by Dow Jones, the last four months will 
see imports of 56 million tonnes each month.
All this and also the unpredictability of China as to when it will 
destock or restock or ask the steel industry to cut production for 
saving energy move the ore market sharply. So also the fact that in 
spite of very low iron content in its ore, China has pushed average 
monthly ore production to 100 million tonnes. Experts say the majority 
of Chinese iron ore mines being underground and the mineral not of 
desired quality, their cost structure is “very high.” But reports from 
China are to the effect that braving all constraints, the country will 
continue to ramp up production of ore. Are not such contradictory 
reports good recipe for price fluctuations?
Chinese steelmakers used to buying good volumes of ore in the spot 
market are showing growing interest in swaps. But the privately-owned 
ones have started hedging their exposure to ore through swaps, but a 
little secretively routing the deals through Singapore exchange. It is, 
however, not that the state-owned companies are not interested in swaps.
What they cannot ignore at this point is the advice from CISA and China 
Chamber of Commerce for Metals and Minerals that they should not be 
“mired in swaps.” At the same time CISA has conveniently left a window 
open for swaps to be used in future.
Whatever that may be, two things will decide as to how fast ore swaps 
will grow. Swaps got the first leg up with the ushering in of the new 
ore price fixing regime and swelling of the spot market beyond fines to 
lump ore.
First, the agencies offering swaps will have to introduce products 
needed for large groups like ArcelorMittal, Bao and TSG to hedge ore 
exposure. Secondly, ore swaps market will grow exponentially once the 
Chinese authorities allow the mills to make use of the instrument for 
hedging risks. In less than a year, the volume of ore traded in the swap
market jumped nearly 12.5 times to 2.5 million tonnes. From here, the 
swap market could grow even faster provided of course Chinese mills come
and participate in the trade openly.
In a mineral where spot trading and not benchmark price system becomes 
the rule, it is only to be expected that more and more miners and user 
mills will make use of swaps liberally for price risk management. In a 
price uncertain market, swaps will allow miners to lock in given ore 
volumes and at prices they want while users get to hedge risk for their 
main raw material.
But where does this leave the middleman? He finds in swaps a way to 
hedge the price of an undisclosed volume of ore. Iron ore swaps were 
kicked off by Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse in 2008 with Japanese 
mills as clients. Morgan Stanley has introduced its set of products 
since. Now wait for other heavyweights like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup 
to ride the ore swaps bandwagon.
Source: Business Standard