![]() |
News was prepared under the information support of Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and international Shipping "Hellenic Shipping News". |
2 Sep 2010
Fuel testing agency Lintec Testing Services says that of the fuel samples it has tested in the last four months, 7.5% exceeded the limit of 1% sulphur content specified under the new Emissions Control Area (ECA) regulations which came into effect
on July 1 this year. Previously, the sulphur content limit had been
1.5%. These results are measured in accordance with the ISO 8217
specification for international marine fuels.
Michael Green, technical manager of Lintec, said it was significant,
that only 2.5% of samples taken inside the new ECA region have had a
sulphur level above 1.06%. “Samples with sulphur levels between 1% and
1.06% can be regarded as being 95% certain to fail the upper
specification limit (of 1%) under ISO 4259 guidelines, referenced under
ISO 8217 for interpretation of test data. That is that they fall within
this ‘grey area’ in terms of single-test results, and would not
necessarily be seen as failing the 1% limit.”
Since May 1 this year, 16.5% of Lintec’s fuel oil samples have been from stems ordered to the maximum 1% sulphur limit
Michael Green added: “In accordance with ISO 4259 principles, bunker
suppliers will need to use 0.94% sulphur as the blend target if they
want to ensure that the fuel they supply will not exceed the 1% ECA
sulphur limit.”
According to Lintec, both ship operators and bunker suppliers now seem
to be well-versed in dealing with sulphur limits, and better prepared
for the implications of the new 1% limit than they were when the 1.5%
limit first took effect.
There is, however, a discrepancy between sulphur verification procedures
endorsed by IMO and those referred to in commercial tests on samples
sent by fuel buyers to fuel testing agencies. The IMO requirements,
which are meant to inform port state control authorities in the event of
compliance testing being conducted on an official MARPOL sample, are
more stringent than those detailed in ISO 4259. The IMO requirement is
for a minimum of two test results, followed by another two if the
average of the first two falls within a grey area, and failure if the
final test result exceeds the sulphur limit by as little as 0.01%.
Mr Green said: “Bunker buyers and sellers will have to decide for
themselves which procedure they will take into consideration in the
event of a borderline sulphur test result.”
Source: Ship Management International